Is so-and-so a Dinosaur?
This is the all-too Frequently Asked Question here
at Dinosaur Rock Guitar. It comes up all the time. People
bring it up in the forum, people e-mail me about it. Someone
asks: is this player or that player a Dinosaur? While
there is obvious consensus on guys like Iommi and Blackmore,
there are plenty of opinions and even disagreements on other
players. I'm supposed to be the arbiter of such weighty decisions,
but the reality is that everyone's take on this subject is
somewhat different, and that's perfectly valid.
The get-off-the-pot-already answer is: I know one
when I hear one. And yes, by my definition, I know implicitly
yes or no on any guitarist I am familiar with.
And when someone's way off, I'll tell them. But where
the lines are fuzzy, I have never wanted my personal take
on the subject to be a strict limiting factor in who we discuss
here. So a better answer is: don't worry about it!
If you want to talk about a player, do so. Not all Dinosaurs
were big, scary carnivores, and not every great guitarist
is a Dinosaur.
So what comprises a Dinosaur Rock Guitarist?
If that answer still didn't satisfy you, and since I came
up with the concept, I've spelled out my take on the subject
below. This way, before you ask: Is so-and-so a Dinosaur?
Or: are you going to profile so-and-so in Alchemy,
you can read my own criteria and see if you can figure it
out for yourself.
The formula for Dinosaur Rock Guitar is equal parts
Melody, (Dino) Attitude, Emotion, and Chops. And while equal
parts means no one of these elements is more important that
the others, the key defining element of Dinosaur Rock Guitar
is an attitude. A ballsy, I wanna tear your head
off with my guitar attitude that comes across in a Dinosaur's
songs and guitar style. Which is why some great guitarists
are simply NOT Dinosaurs. They may possess the other elements,
but do not possess the Dino attitude, mentality, or sensibility.
Dinosaurs don't pussyfoot around. They go for it!
In my mind, Dinosaur Rock Guitarists:
- Don't predate Pete Townshend. The Beatles and the Stones
guitarists are not Dinos. The Yardbirds guitarists are.
- Play heavy rock or melodic heavy metal as their
main thing or embrace those styles in some way. Stevie
Ray Vaughan, Mike Bloomfield, Eric Johnson, and Alvin Lee
are not Dinos. Al Dimeola and John McLaughlin are not Dinos.
John Petrucci is. The guys in Lynyrd Skynard and the Allman
Brothers Band are not Dinos. Carlos Santana is not a Dino.
- Write heavy riffs and typically inject a sexual
element into their music through their lead style. Steve
Morse is a great player but he is so NOT a Dinosaur
which is why he sounds so wrong in Deep Purple.
- Are loud and aggressive. They use heavy, distorted
tones. They gleefully embrace power chords. Lindsay Buckingham
is not a Dino. Mark Knopfler is not a Dino. Steve Howe is
not a Dino. Robby Krieger is not a Dino.
- Place great value in melody in all aspects of their
music (including the vocals when possible). This excludes
some Thrash, most Death Metal and Hardcore, all Rap Metal
basically, a lot of 90s to present metal.
- In general, predate the Shred genre. Shred (as a style
unto itself) is what Dinosaur Rock Guitar evolved into.
The Shred style actually caused a backlash against guitar-oriented
music that devastated Dinosaur Rock Guitar in the process.
Shred is an offshoot. An aberration where technique became
more important than the songs. Dinosaur Rock Guitarists
play for the song and understand that great riffs
and great songs are FAR more important than lead chops.
Having great chops is an asset, and certainly impresses
other players, but it's great riffs and great songs that
add up to great music that hits any audience
on the gut level. In my mind, this disqualifies
the vast majority of the Shrapnel shred guys and the Neo-Classical
crowd who often create music to showcase their lead
guitar prowess rather than creating strong, riff-based compositions.
Lead work aside how much shred is memorable music?
Jimmy Page, Joe Perry, and Angus Young are big honking Dinos
who have created timeless Dino Rock music without
particulalry impressive lead chops. How many Zeppelin, Aerosmith,
or AC/DC songs can you name off the top of your head? How
many can you name from the average shredder? Now there is
certainly some crossover among the forum members who like
both Dino and Shred styles and if you like shred,
that's cool but offically, we are not a Shred site.
Andy sees value in some of these players. But John and I
have no plans to profile any of them.
- Are very effective lead players regardless of their chops
level (Rudi Schenker and Angus Young come to mind). Most
do have excellent lead chops, but Dinos also understand
that there is just as much value in playing slowly and melodically
as there is in playing the fast stuff. Those that don't
have great chops, succeed on other Dino aspects such as
pure balls, riffs, songs, attitude, tone. Neil Young is
not a Dino!
- In general, don't play corporate suck-ass rock. The guys
in Styx, Foreigner, the Eagles, and Boston are not Dinos.
Steve Lukather is a Dino when he's not it Toto. Neal Schon
strays into Dino territory on occasion. Some guys who I
consider are borderline (like Schon) may get profiled if
somone else wants to write about them.
- With all due respect to our terrific female Dinos over
at the forum, most women don't dig Dinosaur Rock Guitar
music. Bands with large female followings like Bon Jovi
are not usually Dinos.
Your mileage may vary, but this is how I view the Dinosaur
Rock Guitar genre. The official focus of the site (and who
we profile in Guitar Alchemy) is going to remain only Dinos
as defined by these general guidelines.
But here's another thought to chew on: Alchemy proflies typically
take 8 to 12 hours to write not including the background
research and listening. As such, we probably won't write
a profile on every guitarist who might qualify as a
Dino. Some of them just don't warrant that effort based
on what they've accomplished. Others, the DRG staff just may
not have the familiarity with the player to do a good job.
And yes, in some case, we just don't have the inclanation
to write a profile. We'll profile players we may not personally
care for if they're important in the genre. But other than
that, we profile the players we like. Sorry. We're
human.
I hope this clarifies things.
Dave.
Copyright ©2003 All rights reserved.
|
|